Qualification
SAQA ID 96468
NQF Level 10
Registered-data under construction

Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy

Purpose:

Source: SAQA official qualification record. Yiba Verified does not own the underlying qualification data shown on this page.

Qualification type

Doctoral Degree

Credits

360

Sub-framework

HEQSF - Higher Education Qualifications Sub-framework

Providers listed

1

Qualification snapshot

Official qualification identity fields captured from the qualification record.

Originator

University of Fort Hare

Quality assurance functionary

CHE - Council on Higher Education

Field

Field 07 - Human and Social Studies

Subfield

General Social Science

Qual class

Regular-Provider-ELOAC

Recognise previous learning

Y

Important dates

These dates are carried directly from the qualification record.

Registration start

2024-07-01

Registration end

2027-06-30

Last date for enrolment

2027-06-30

Last date for achievement

2029-06-30

Purpose and entry context

Official SAQA text formatted for easier reading.

Purpose and rationale

Purpose

This qualification is aimed at producing specialists in the various career fields such as Education, Research and Government.

On completion of this qualification the student would have gained a comprehensive grasp of the discipline and would have a critical understanding of advanced research methodologies. The student would be able to comfortably do independent research which could result in publishable work. The student would also have gained the ability to confidently defend his/her research and communicate the findings on an international level.

Rationale

  • The rationale for this qualification is to expand the base of expertise with regards to new research initiatives as well as to produce more independent and publishable work:

> To demonstrate in-depth and expert knowledge and skills as a competent reader, writer and speaker on philosophical matters, at a most advanced level.

> To demonstrate the ability to do independent research at the most advanced level in the field of philosophy.

  • This is a non-professional qualification.
  • Learners would be required to be in possession of a Master's Degree in order to be considered to register for this qualification which would inevitably qualify them (depending on their area of specialisation) to operate as one of the following: Professional educator, academic researcher etc.
  • As mentioned above this qualification opens up a manifold of career opportunities with the most appropriate being the Professional educator.
  • Not only does this much specialised qualification enrich the knowledge of the learner, but it also creates the opportunity for the dissemination of new research/knowledge within the broader society.

Entry requirements and RPL

Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL)

Master's Degree or equivalent qualification in philosophy provided that such qualification would be suitable to serve as basis for advanced research in the discipline.

Entry Requirements

Master of Arts in Philosophy or equivalent.

Structure and assessment

Qualification rules, exit outcomes, and assessment criteria from the SAQA record.

Qualification rules

100% Research.

Exit level outcomes

Exit Level Outcome 1

Student will be able to

Specific

  • Demonstrate his/her drawing on a wide range of theoretical and practical skills derived from different branches of philosophy.
  • Demonstrate the capacity to design, conduct and write up research that is original, relevant and which contributes to knowledge and insight into the area of interest in philosophy and that can respectably stand alongside refereed and published research in the same field.
  • Demonstrate an understanding of philosophical methods and an ability to cope with research techniques.
  • Demonstrate an understanding of philosophy related to the research problem.

Critical

  • Initiate, guide and reflect with participants on the empowerment of the community and its members in the philosophical spheres of life.
  • Organise and manage his/her activities and time.
  • Analyse, reformat and evaluate a wide range of information pertaining to philosophical issues.
  • Communicate effectively, using visual and language skills in the mode of oral and written presentation.
  • Demonstrate an understanding of the world as a set of related systems by recognising that problem-solving contexts do not exist in isolation.
  • Reflect on and explore a variety of strategies to learn more effectively.
  • Be culturally and aesthetically aware across a range of social contexts.
  • Explore educational and career opportunities.

Associated assessment criteria

Associated Assessment Criteria For Exit Level Outcome 1

Student will be able to demonstrate knowledge, skills, and values by

  • Generating contextually relevant interpretations of philosophical texts by using recognized analytical and hermeneutic methods. This relates to AC 4 on Blooms Taxonomy (Analysis) and outcomes will be measured and examined in terms of whether an appropriate scope of literature has been covered and integrated, whether the use of such literature is relevant and the interpretation accurate.
  • Integrating secondary resources to interpret texts in a way relevant to the broader social context. This relates to AC 4 and 5 of Blooms Taxonomy (Analysis and Synthesis) and outcomes will be measured in terms of whether insights emerging form literature on the broader social context have been integrated into the study to a sufficient degree, and whether problems have been conceptualised with the appropriate degree of contextual sensitivity.
  • Explain the cultural and social features of the communities behind texts and identify the differences between those and contemporary communities, where necessary Integrating historical sources to interpret the history of interpretation in their respective contexts.
  • Writing research proposals that indicate that the learners are able to identify a problem or problems in philosophy, and formulate research problems and subsets of problems and suggest possible solutions.
  • Knowing, selecting and utilising research frameworks that are relevant to the research of a specific problem in philosophy.
  • This relates to AC levels 4, 5 and 6 (Analysis, Synthesis, and Evaluation). Assessment will be implemented on both research proposals and research outcomes in terms of whether the research is situated within a generally recognized area of philosophy.
  • Create a theoretical framework provided by the literature review.
  • Select and use appropriate methods to interpret the material of the investigation.
  • Evaluate and interpret texts.
  • Make conceptual suggestions or create a new theory that can be applied to solve the problem investigated.
  • Identify and analyse different philosophical procedures in terms of the problem being researched (relates to AC 4).
  • Critically read, interpret and analyse literature from different sources.
  • Search for literature in the identified research problem.
  • Compare the writings of different authors on the same related topic.
  • Synthesize reading material on the topic being researched.
  • Draw conclusions from different readings and indicate anomalies.
  • Create a new model/approach/theory that is applicable to the research problem.
  • Compile a complete bibliography/reference list.

Integrated Assessment

100% Research Thesis examined both internally as well as externally to ensure that student conform to national and international standards.

Formative

  • Defending Research Proposal.

Summative

  • Comprehensive thesis.

Progression and comparability

Articulation options

Horizontal articulation could be established with following cognate discipline: African studies, Linguistics, Psychology, Sociology, Theology, History and Music.

International comparability

This Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy is comparable to similar qualifications and best practices around the world with regard to outcomes and assessment criteria, the level of depth and complexity involved in the study processes and the notional hours in research activities.

To ensure international comparability the Level Descriptors were benchmarked against the standards and norms contained in the qualifications frameworks of well-known and reputable universities.

The qualification standard was constructed using the qualification descriptors for the advanced studies for a Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) Degree in philosophy around the globe. These include: scope of knowledge; knowledge literacy; method and procedure; problem solving; ethics and professional practice; accessing, processing and managing information; producing and communicating information; context and systems; management of learning; and accountability.

Providers currently listed

This reflects provider names published on the official record. It is useful for qualification discovery, but it should not be treated as a substitute for checking the relevant quality body’s latest provider status.

University of Fort Hare

Related Qualifications

Explore other relevant certificates and degrees in this field.

ID: 5807
Lvl 10
1 provider

The primary purpose of the qualification is to provide DAdmin graduates who are capable of advancing knowledge in and providing an original contribution to a major discipline or specialized field of study.

ID: 9407
Lvl 10
1 provider

The qualification aims to:

ID: 72886
Lvl 10
1 provider

The purpose of the qualification is: - To provide an opportunity for learners to obtain detailed knowledge of the discipline concerned and to create an awareness of the variety of institutional contexts in which it is applied.

ID: 96566
Lvl 10
1 provider

Registered-data under construction

ID: 96869
Lvl 10
1 provider

The purpose of this qualification is to create and develop technological innovations and to further technological advancements in the field of agriculture. The person achieving this qualification will be competent to complete a specialised independent research project in the field of agricultural technology. The qualifying learner will be an authority on previous research and the latest technology and techniques in the appropriate field of expertise.

Use this qualification in your readiness workflow

Once the qualification identity is clear, your institution can structure the readiness work around the right title, NQF level, dates, and supporting records instead of rebuilding that story later.