Doctor of Philosophy in Archaeology
The purpose of this qualification is to develop researchers who can make independent and innovative contributions to the advanced development of knowledge in Archaeology. This is done through the successful production of a research project wherein adequate understanding of the sub-discipline(s) under study are demonstrated through the two-fold process of developing a research proposal and secondly, an extended length research project in the form of a thesis. In the thesis, the learner must demonstrate that they can pursue research through the scientific methods of enquiry, interpretation, analysis of relevant data, critical reflection and other discipline-specific techniques, all of which must be in keeping with recognised academic standards, linguistic skills and data collection competencies.
Source: SAQA official qualification record. Yiba Verified does not own the underlying qualification data shown on this page.
Qualification type
Doctoral Degree
Credits
360
Sub-framework
HEQSF - Higher Education Qualifications Sub-framework
Providers listed
0
Qualification snapshot
Official qualification identity fields captured from the qualification record.
Originator
University of South Africa
Quality assurance functionary
-
Field
Field 07 - Human and Social Studies
Subfield
Traditions, History and Legacies
Qual class
Regular-Provider-ELOAC
Recognise previous learning
Y
Important dates
These dates are carried directly from the qualification record.
Registration start
2021-07-01
Registration end
2027-06-30
Last date for enrolment
2028-06-30
Last date for achievement
2031-06-30
Purpose and entry context
Official SAQA text formatted for easier reading.
Purpose and rationale
The purpose of this qualification is to develop researchers who can make independent and innovative contributions to the advanced development of knowledge in Archaeology. This is done through the successful production of a research project wherein adequate understanding of the sub-discipline(s) under study are demonstrated through the two-fold process of developing a research proposal and secondly, an extended length research project in the form of a thesis. In the thesis, the learner must demonstrate that they can pursue research through the scientific methods of enquiry, interpretation, analysis of relevant data, critical reflection and other discipline-specific techniques, all of which must be in keeping with recognised academic standards, linguistic skills and data collection competencies.
Rationale
This qualification develops learner expertise in the theories, methodologies and practice of Archaeology in both the academic and professional realms. In particular, the qualification prepares learners for an academic career in archaeology. It requires them to make an original contribution to knowledge in archaeology or one of its associated sub-disciplines in such a way that it demonstrates their competence in their chosen field of specialisation and their ability to work independently in the field and/or laboratory and/or theory production. This contribution to knowledge and disciplinary competence is evidenced in the production of innovative knowledge and/or methodologies and/or theoretical perspectives.
Entry requirements and RPL
Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL)
Admission may be granted through RPL to learners who do not meet the minimum entry requirements. All admissions through RPL must be in accordance with the principles laid down in the Unisa RPL Policy. This qualification can be achieved wholly or in part through Recognition of Prior Learning. The University of South Africa (Unisa) RPL office can supply full details of processes relating to the assessment and accreditation of learning from prior experiences. Evidence can be presented in a variety of forms, including international or previous local qualifications, reports, testimonials mentioning functions performed, work records, portfolios, videos of practice and performance records. All such evidence should be judged according to the general principle of assessment described in the notes to assessors.
Entry Requirements
A Master's Degree in Archaeology, Level 9 with at least 60% for the dissertation.
Replacement note
This qualification does not replace any other qualification and is not replaced by any other qualification.
Structure and assessment
Qualification rules, exit outcomes, and assessment criteria from the SAQA record.
Qualification rules
The Doctor of Philosophy in Archaeology consists of two compulsory modules at National Qualifications Framework (NQF) Level 10 totalling 360 Credits.
Modules
- Research Proposal, 0 Credits.
- Research Project and Thesis, 360 Credits.
Exit level outcomes
Learners completing this programme are expected to demonstrate
- Expertise and critical knowledge in the current theoretical and methodological trends in archaeology or specified archaeological sub-discipline; the ability to situate their own work with regard to these trends; and, ultimately to contribute to local and international scholarly debates in archaeology.
- The ability to formulate new research questions that will contribute new knowledge to the discipline, and to design and implement innovative methods and techniques or to use existing techniques in a novel way, where appropriate.
- Leadership and decision-making in the management and organisation of data collection, possibly through the supervision of field and/or laboratory assistants.
- The capacity to apply archaeological theories and techniques to gather relevant data in order to address complex practical and theoretical problems in archaeology.
- The ability to conduct archaeological research in an ethical and professional manner that will characterise their mode of practice, interaction with the authorities and engagement with relevant stakeholders. Learners should be able to anticipate and proactively address emerging ethical concerns.
- The ability to conduct research on an advanced topic in archaeology or a specified archaeological sub-discipline which is publishable in peer reviewed journals.
Associated assessment criteria
Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcomes
- Pro-actively solve problems when designing and implementing research methodology, in the analysis and presentation of data and in interactions with stakeholders.
- Work co-operatively and manage relations with supervisor(s), field crews, laboratory assistants, stakeholders (communities, landowners, government agencies) as well as, where relevant, fellow members of a joint research team.
- Show initiative in working independently in data collection, analysis and research write-up.
- Assume responsibility for reporting to research funding agencies, communities, landowners, heritage institutions and government agencies.
- Collect, analyse and store knowledge from a variety of sources.
- Communicate with peers and other interested parties.
- Write up and graphically represent research results in the form of the thesis.
- Develop presentation and communication skills through conference and seminar presentations.
- Use a broad range of comparative and holistic analyses.
- Be familiar with the local, national and global significance of heritage contexts and contribute to the overall protection of these contexts and show respect to the wishes of those with a vested interest in specific contexts.
- Working with people from diverse ethnic and linguistic backgrounds.
Integrated Assessment
- All assessments are conducted in line with the principles of assessment as defined in the University of South Africa (UNISA) Assessment Policy.
- Submitted proposals are assessed and approved by the supervisor and Departmental Research and Higher Degrees Committee to be ratified by the College Research and Higher Degrees Committee.
- After consultation with the co-supervisor (where applicable), the supervisor gives the learner permission to submit his/her thesis.
- Assessment will include input from three external examiners of which at least one should be from a county other than South Africa. External examiners must be recognised experts in their fields and must not be attached to or affiliated with UNISA. All examiners are recommended by the Department Chairperson and/or Departmental Research and Higher Degrees Committee and their names are forwarded for appointment by the College Management Committee.
- The completed report of the panel of examiners is regarded as the examiners' final recommendation. The result of the Doctoral thesis is based on a judicious appraisal of the examiners' reports.
- After the result of the learner's thesis has been approved the non-examining chairperson makes the examiners' report available to the Chairperson of the Department, the supervisor, the co-supervisor, the candidate and the other examiners if requested.
In addition, learners must demonstrate the ability to engage in the field of Archaeology in an integrative way, dealing with mathematical challenges strategically and effectively. It is recommended for this ability to be demonstrated by the publication of at least one article based on the research, in a scientific peer reviewed journal.
Progression and comparability
Articulation options
This qualification articulates horizontally with others at Level 10 within the subfield.
The Doctor of Philosophy in Archaeology is the final step on the academic ladder. No further upward articulation is possible although learners may choose to pursue their studies at any level of the National Qualifications Framework (NQF) to suit their personal and professional needs.
International comparability
- Archaeology comprises a wide range of sub-disciplines with many universities around the world offering a Doctoral programme in archaeology or in a related discipline with an archaeological focus.
- Institutions in the United States of America (USA) often include a coursework component as a requirement for the Degree which is not included in this particular qualification.
- A comparable qualification is offered at United Kingdom (UK) universities where a Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Archaeology is based on the production of a Doctoral thesis.
Many universities in Africa have similar requirements
- Since archaeology is a cross-disciplinary field with researchers actively working on topics that cover various geographic regions and subjects, rigorous and ethical scientific research processes are internationally determined.
- University of South Africa (Unisa) forms part of an internationally recognised accreditation system whereby university qualifications are evaluated against international comparators and accredited accordingly; for example, Unisa's qualifications are accredited in the International Handbook of Universities and in the Commonwealth Universities' Yearbook.
Providers currently listed
This reflects provider names published on the official record. It is useful for qualification discovery, but it should not be treated as a substitute for checking the relevant quality body’s latest provider status.
No provider listing was captured on this qualification record.
Related Qualifications
Explore other relevant certificates and degrees in this field.
The primary purpose of the qualification is to provide DAdmin graduates who are capable of advancing knowledge in and providing an original contribution to a major discipline or specialized field of study.
The qualification aims to:
The purpose of the qualification is: - To provide an opportunity for learners to obtain detailed knowledge of the discipline concerned and to create an awareness of the variety of institutional contexts in which it is applied.
Registered-data under construction
The purpose of this qualification is to create and develop technological innovations and to further technological advancements in the field of agriculture. The person achieving this qualification will be competent to complete a specialised independent research project in the field of agricultural technology. The qualifying learner will be an authority on previous research and the latest technology and techniques in the appropriate field of expertise.
Use this qualification in your readiness workflow
Once the qualification identity is clear, your institution can structure the readiness work around the right title, NQF level, dates, and supporting records instead of rebuilding that story later.