Doctor of Agriculture

The purpose of this qualification is to create and develop technological innovations and to further technological advancements in the field of agriculture.

The person achieving this qualification will be competent to complete a specialised independent research project in the field of agricultural technology.

The qualifying learner will be an authority on previous research and the latest technology and techniques in the appropriate field of expertise.

Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL)

Access can be gained through RPL by learners who do not meet the minimum entry requirements.

Entry Requirements

An appropriate Master's Degree, Level 9 or an equivalent qualification.

The research proposal must be approved before a learner may register for this qualification.

1. Identify, plan, conduct, interpret and present an applied research project.

1.1. Relevant topic is identified.

• Topic is original.
• Topic is applicable in the context of agricultural production/technology/management/extension or a combination of the above.
• Research proposal is submitted and approved.

1.2. Literature review is comprehensive.

• Literature review is systematic.
• Literature review is relevant.
• Knowledge of the potential research area is demonstrated.
• Pilot study is conducted where applicable.

1.3. Problem is identified.

• Problem is defined.
• Problem statement is formulated effectively.
• Research objectives are determined.
• Research strategy is determined.
• Research methodology is selected.

1.4. Title identifies the research area and field.

• Title clearly indicates the problem.

1.5. Direction of research is clear.

• Preliminary explanation.
• Knowledge of the relationship between hypothesis and assumptions is applied where applicable.

1.6. Primary objectives are formulated.

• Secondary objectives are formulated.
• Objectives direct the planning of the proposed research project.

1.7. A complete plan is submitted within three months of registration.

• Research strategy is effective.
• Appropriate data is identified.
• The universe parameters are identified and are accurate.
• Planned evaluation of research is appropriate.
• Planned method of presentation is appropriate.
• Research proposal and design are quantitative and qualitative.

1.8. Research tools are applied effectively.

• Literature review is integrated effectively.
• Authoritative knowledge of latest technology and techniques is demonstrated and applied.
• Appropriate research methodology is applied.
• Sampling is correct.
• Data is collected effectively.
• Management of project is effective.
• Data is processed correctly.
• Data and conclusions are presented and analysed effectively.
• Independent initiative is demonstrated.

1.9. Data is interpreted correctly.

• Conclusions are drawn logically.
• Findings are original

1.10. Appropriate method of reporting is identified.

• Presentation of research project complies with the necessary format.
• Content is in a logical sequence.
• Content is comprehensive and concise.
• Insight is demonstrated.
• Content is relevant.
• Language is appropriate.
• Reference method and bibliography are correct.
• Recommendations and conclusion are relevant.
• Presentation method is highly effective.
• Highly advanced communication skills are demonstrated.
• Scientific communication is advanced.
• Completion of project is within the prescribed time frame.
• Research ethics are adhered to.
• Research is published as required.
• Findings contribute significantly to the appropriate field.

Integrated Assessment

The thesis will be assessed internally and externally.

Oral and written presentations on the research and its findings are also assessed.