Qualification
SAQA ID 124426
NQF Level 05
Registered

Occupational Certificate: Quantity Surveying Viability Planner

The purpose of this part qualification is to prepare a learner to be a Quantity Surveying Viability Planner.

Sources: SAQA official qualification record, SAQA registered qualifications record. Yiba Verified does not own the underlying qualification data shown on this page.

Qualification type

Higher Occupational Cert

Credits

53

Sub-framework

OQSF - Occupational Qualifications Sub-framework

Providers listed

0

Qualification snapshot

Official qualification identity fields captured from the qualification record.

Originator

Development Quality Partner - CETA

Quality assurance functionary

QCTO - Quality Council for Trades and Occupations

Field

Field 12 - Physical Planning and Construction

Subfield

Physical Planning, Design and Management

Qual class

Regular-ELOAC

Recognise previous learning

Y

Important dates

These dates are carried directly from the qualification record.

Registration start

2025-06-03

Registration end

2030-06-03

Last date for enrolment

2031-06-03

Last date for achievement

2034-06-03

Purpose and entry context

Official SAQA text formatted for easier reading.

Purpose and rationale

The purpose of this part qualification is to prepare a learner to be a Quantity Surveying Viability Planner.

A qualified learner will be able to

  • perform construction project cost estimation.
  • conduct a viability study on a construction project, and
  • produce a viability report.

Achieving this Quantity Surveying Viability Planner part qualification will provide several benefits to the learner, including:

  • Carrying out a viability study will ensure the successful completion of construction projects and give learners the skills needed to inform their clients on information pertaining to their investment decisions.
  • Being able to analyse a number of factors that help in making the final determination regarding a construction project.
  • Undertaking calculations to determine total building costs, total capital outlay, operating costs and return on investment.
  • Performing cost estimates and producing viability study reports with respect to construction projects.
  • An understanding of property, real estate investments, the processes involved, and developing a framework for an investment strategy.
  • Expanding the horizons of a Quantity Surveying Viability Planner who will operate in a niche field within the Quantity Surveying Profession and then be able to pursue other qualifications.
  • Being accessible to learners from other fields like engineering, property development etc.

Typical graduate attributes include proficiency, efficiency, and effectiveness in completing various viability studies-related tasks. A Quantity Surveying Viability Planner is a person of integrity and high ethical standards as they need to ensure that construction projects, which are inherently costly, are only undertaken if the viability study indicates or predicts their likely success, thus ensuring completion of projects without getting into budgetary difficulties.

Rationale

There is a significant need for this part qualification to exist. A viability study is a detailed look at how profitable a business idea might be. This type of study does not consider whether something can be done instead, it looks at whether or not it is worth doing. Because it helps uncover potential problems or dangers associated with a project before major financial resources are committed to it, a viability study is an important tool for all stakeholders in the Built Environment profession. A viability study increases success probability. These points emphasise the importance of the Occupational Certificate: Quantity Surveying Viability Planner.

The Quantity Surveying Viability Planner operates in the broad construction sector, making a significant contribution to the South African economy. According to a report titled 'South Africa Construction Market Size, Trend Analysis by Sector, Competitive Landscape and Forecast to 2027' (December 2023), the South Africa construction market size was $25.5 billion in 2022. The market is projected to achieve an Average Annual Growth Rate (AAGR) of more than 3% during 2024-2027. This emphasises the potential role that can and will be played by the Quantity Surveying Viability Planner, as part of a very niche function within the Quantity Surveying profession.

The Quantity Surveying Viability Planner part qualification is becoming increasingly sought after by those involved in the quantity surveying and construction sectors.

Currently, there is neither a qualification nor a part-qualification on a viability or feasibility study registered on the NQF, and neither is there any skills programme on viability studies recorded at the QCTO.

The Quantity Surveying sector and by extension the Built Environment sector will benefit substantially because the Quantity Surveying Viability Planner will assist project owners to determine whether a construction project is financially viable before any construction starts. It also allows the Quantity Surveying Viability Planner the opportunity to give project owners an informed indication of their expected return on investment, which would influence the owner's investment decision (i.e. whether to proceed with a project, make amendments to the project or discontinue the project altogether and look for a different investment alternative). This qualification will become an enabling mechanism and will ensure the increased success of projects whose owners have the wherewithal to start and complete projects. This qualification will also save prospective clients and property developers from starting on a project that is not financially viable and which could potentially place them in huge financial debt.

Concept and viability planning encompass many areas of the built environment, including residential, commercial, industrial, civil construction and shopping centre developments. Successful feasibilities lead to the successful execution of many projects which, in turn, provide an impetus for job creation opportunities for many industry participants. This qualification would lead to skills enhancement and create and eco-system for employment.

Increased employment brings about a concomitant beneficial impact on the economy because the construction/quantity surveying industry plays such a significant role in the economy.

Typical learners will be school leavers and those already working in the quantity surveying, construction, and engineering sectors.

This part qualification is also for people wanting to work in the built environment and construction sectors, with an interest in quantity surveying and who need core knowledge and skills required in the sector.

In terms of the learning pathway, they could pursue the Quantity Surveying Assistant qualification once it is registered. At the current moment this is the only part qualification available which is the lead in this space, therefore the articulation possibilities are not viable at the current moment. There could be qualifications in future perhaps during the review where the articulation within and across will be possible.

Various stakeholders participated in the development of this part qualification.

Entry requirements and RPL

RPL for Access to Training

Learners may use the RPL process to gain access to training opportunities for a programme of learning, qualification, part-qualification or skills programme if they do not meet the formal, minimum entry requirements for admission. RPL assessment provides an alternative access route into a programme of learning, qualification, part-qualification, or skills programme.

Such an RPL assessment may be developed, moderated and conducted by the accredited Skills Development Provider which offers that specific qualification/part qualification/skills programme. Such an assessment must ensure that the learner is able to display the equivalent level of competencies required for access, based on the NQF level descriptors.

RPL for Exemption of Modules

For exemption from modules through RPL, learners who have gained the stipulated competencies of the modules of a programme of learning, qualification, part-qualification or skills programme through any means of formal, informal or non-formal learning and/or work experience, may be awarded credits towards relevant modules, and gaps identified for training, which is then concluded.

RPL for credits

Learners who have gained the stipulated competencies of the modules of a programme of learning, qualification, part-qualification or skills programme through any means of formal, informal or non-formal learning and/or work experience, may be awarded credits towards relevant modules, and gaps identified for training, which is then concluded.

RPL for Access to the External Integrated Summative Assessment (EISA)

A valid Statement of Results is required for admission to the EISA in which confirmation of achievement is provided that all internal assessment criteria for all modules in the related curriculum document have been achieved.

Upon successful completion of the EISA, RPL learners will be issued with the QCTO certificate for the qualification, part-qualification or skills programme. Quality partners are responsible for ensuring the RPL mechanism and process for qualifications and part-qualification are approved by the QCTO.

Entry Requirements

An NQF Level 4 qualification, with mathematics and science.

Replacement note

This qualification does not replace any other qualification and is not replaced by any other qualification.

Structure and assessment

Qualification rules, exit outcomes, and assessment criteria from the SAQA record.

Qualification rules

This qualification is made up of compulsory Knowledge, Practical Skill and Work Experience Modules

Knowledge Modules

  • 214904-001-00-KM-01, Project Scope, NQF Level 4, 5 Credits.
  • 214904-001-00-KM-04, Project Cost Estimation and Financial Viability Planning and Reporting, NQF Level 5, 11 Credits.

Total number of credits for Knowledge Modules: 16

Practical Skill Modules

  • 214904-001-00-PM-01, Participate as a Quantity Surveyor Assistant in Project Scope definition (Pre-construction phase), NQF Level 4, 5 Credits.
  • 214904-001-00-PM-05, Participate as a Quantity Surveyor Assistant in cost estimation, Performing a Viability Study and Completing a viability Study Report, NQF Level 5, 10 Credits.
  • 214904-001-00-PM-03, Participate in Self-Development Processes, NQF Level 4, 5 Credits.

Total number of credits for Practical Skill Modules: 20

Work Experience Modules

  • 214904-001-00-WM-01, Processes to Participate as a Quantity Surveyor Assistant in Project Scope definition (pre-construction phase), NQF Level 4, 5 Credits.
  • 214904-001-00-WM-03, Processes to Participate as a Quantity Surveyor Assistant in Cost Estimation, Performing a Viability study and Completing a Viability Study Report, NQF Level 5, 12 Credits.

Total number of credits for Work Experience Modules: 17

Exit level outcomes

  1. Perform project cost estimation, conduct a viability study and develop a viability report.

Associated assessment criteria

Associated Assessment Criteria for Exit Level Outcome 1

ELO 1: Perform project cost estimation, conduct a viability study and develop a viability report.

  • Analyse concepts, principles and theory related to a viability study to enhance understanding of a viability study within the quantity surveying sector.
  • Collect information for a viability study in the quantity surveying sector is collected from a range of sources and analyse, synthesise and evaluate.
  • Interpret and analyse construction drawings and perform various calculations to enable cost estimation for a project.
  • Perform analyses of client's requirements/brief, scope of project, market trends, the political, economic, demographic, macro-economic, local economic and property trends, and urban growth to enable the generation of a viability study in the quantity surveying sector.
  • Estimate the total capital outlay of the project, total project income and costs and prepare a cash flow projection for the development period to indicate whether the intended project is a viable proposition.
  • Assess risks, uncertainties, and financial returns associated with a viability study to ensure that a construction project has the prospect of success.
  • Generate a viability study is produced using the various analyses, estimations and assessments, a viability study report is developed using the appropriate format and structure, and supporting documentation Associated Assessment Criteria.

Integrated Assessment

Formative Assessments conducted internally

Formative assessments are conducted throughout the training of learners. A range of formal, non-formal, and informal ongoing assessment activities are used to focus on teaching and learning outcomes to improve learner attainment.

Formative assessments are conducted continuously by the facilitator to feed into further learning, to identify strengths and weakness, and to ensure the learner's ability to apply knowledge, skills and workplace experience gained.

Formative Assessments are conducted by the accredited Skills Development Provider (SDP), and a variety of ongoing assessment methods may be used, for example, quizzes, assignments, tests, scenarios, role play, interviews. Continuous feedback must be provided.

Integrated Summative Assessments conducted Internally

Integrated Assessment involves all the different types of assessment tasks required for a particular qualification, such as written assessment of theory and practical demonstration of competence. To achieve this, the Internal Assessment Criteria (IAC) for all modules as found in the QCTO curriculum document must be followed.

An accredited SDP should implement a well-designed, formal, relevant, final internal Summative Assessment strategy for all modules to prepare learners for the EISA. These assessments evaluate learning achievements relating to the achievement of each module of the relevant components of the qualification.

Internal Summative Assessments are developed, moderated and conducted by the SDP at the end of each module or after integration of relevant modules, e.g. applied knowledge tests, workplace tasks, practical demonstrations, simulated tasks/demonstrations, projects, case studies, etc.

The results of these final formal summative assessments must be recorded. These results, which include the Statement of Work Experience results, where applicable, contribute to the Statement of Results (SoR) that is a requirement for admission to the EISA. An SoR, using the template provided by the Quality Partner, is issued by the accredited SDP for qualifications and part-qualifications. The SDP must produce a valid Statement of Results for each learner, indicating the final result and the date on which the competence in each module, of each component, was achieved. Learners are required to produce this SoR, together with their ID document or alternative ID document, at the point of the EISA.

External Integrated Summative Assessment (EISA) - a national assessment

The Quality Partner is responsible for the management, conduct and implementation of the External Integrated Summative Assessment (EISA), in accordance with QCTO set standards. Competence in the EISA is a requirement for certificating a learner.

For entrance into the EISA, the learner requires a valid Statement of Results issued by the accredited institution indicating the attainment of all modules for the Knowledge, Practical and Work Experience modules.

Progression and comparability

Articulation options

This qualification provides opportunities for horizontal and vertical articulation options.

Horizontal Articulation

  • There are no horizontal articulation possibilities within the OQSF as there were no registered qualifications available at the time when this qualification was recommended for registration.
  • There are no horizontal articulation possibilities between sub-frameworks as there were no registered qualifications available at the time when this qualification was recommended for registration.

Vertical Articulation

  • There are no vertical articulation possibilities within the OQSF as there were no registered qualifications available at the time when this qualification was recommended for registration.

Diagonal Articulation

  • This qualification does not articulate diagonally as there were no registered qualifications available at the time when this qualification was recommended for registration.

NOTES

Additional Legal or Physical Entry Requirements

None

Criteria for the accreditation of providers

Accreditation requirements, against which Skills Development Providers (SDP) and Assessment Centres, will be accredited, is found in the Curriculum Document, as listed below.

The curriculum title and code is: Occupational Certificate: Quantity Surveying Viability Planner: 214904-001-00-01.

Encompassed Trade

None

Assessment Quality Partner (AQP)

Construction Sector and Education Authority (CETA).

International comparability

An international comparability study was undertaken to identify qualifications similar to this South African part qualification in terms of scope, cognitive levels and content of the curricula. In essence, the purpose of the exercise was to compare the Quantity Surveying Viability Planner Assistant part qualification against comparable qualifications in two other countries, namely, New Zealand and the United Kingdom.

An analysis of the qualifications in these countries has revealed that there is a significant level of similarity between this part qualification and those in the identified countries.

New Zealand

Open Polytechnic is an institution that offers an online course entitled "Feasibility and Analytical Reports for Construction Projects" at NQF Level 5 over a period of 16 weeks. The site on which a building is developed places constraints that identify the limitations in a site; to demonstrate knowledge of the research, feasibility and environmental study in terms of legislative requirements; establish the condition of an existing building; and present information from the research, feasibility and environmental study on the design and construction of that building.

Students who complete this course will be able to

  • Identify constraints and describe the limitations of an existing building site in terms of relevant legislative requirements and building implications for the repair or alteration of the structure.
  • Create a simple technical sketch of the given site to include all structures and impediments that exist.
  • Research the causes to the condition of the building taking into account climate and environmental factors including atmosphere, weather, human, insect and animal.
  • Provide a report to describe the condition of an existing building, identifying the work required to repair or alter the building with consideration to the requirements of the Building Code.

Similarities

The following similarities are noted

  • The course is at the same NQF level as the South African qualification.
  • Identification of constraints and describing the limitations of a project.
  • Creating sketches of construction sites and including technical details.
  • Preparing a viability report.
  • Ensuring relevant legislative requirements.

Differences

The following aspects are noted

  • Entry requirements are not specified.
  • Duration: The South African qualification is 13 weeks while the New Zealand course is 16 weeks.
  • Articulation possibilities are not specified.
  • Research on the causes of the condition of the building taking into account climate and environmental factors including atmosphere, weather, human, insect and animal.

United Kingdom

Rcademy offers "The Feasibility Studies and Business Planning Training Course". It is structured for a range of people working in different sectors of the economy like Project Managers, Change Managers, Company Directors, Business Analysts, HR Professionals, etc.

The course objectives are

  • Understand the rudiments of feasibility studies and business planning and how to integrate feasibility into a business plan.
  • Learn about the relationship, similarities, and differences between business planning and feasibility study.
  • Recognise the core elements of business planning and feasibility studies.
  • Learn about the tools, techniques, processes, ad models of feasibility studies and business planning.
  • Learn how to conduct an effective and robust feasibility study.
  • Understand the importance of feasibility studies and the types of feasibility studies.
  • Learn how to establish objectives for a business plan.
  • Recognise the various problems and challenges associated with a feasibility study and how to overcome them.

The training content is as follows. There are ten modules; all are listed below. Only those components in each module which have relevance for this comparability exercise have been retained.

  • Introduction to Feasibility Studies.
  • Elements of Feasibility Study.
  • Fundamentals of Business Planning.
  • Financial Models and Accounting Models of Feasibility.
  • Planning a Feasibility Study.
  • Considering Risks and Options Involved.
  • The Strategic Context of Business Decisions.
  • Engaging with Stakeholders and Preparing the Report.
  • Recognising and Assessing Available Alternatives.
  • Designing an Effective Business Plan and Business Planning Tools.

Similarities

The following similarities in terms of course objectives are noted

  • Understand the rudiments of feasibility studies.
  • Recognise the core elements of feasibility studies.
  • Learn about the tools, techniques, processes, ad models of feasibility studies.
  • Learn how to conduct an effective and robust feasibility study.
  • Understand the importance of feasibility studies and the types of feasibility studies.
  • Recognise the various problems and challenges associated with a feasibility study and how to overcome them.

The following similarities in terms of course content is noted

  • Introduction to Feasibility Studies.
  • Elements of Feasibility Study.
  • Planning a Feasibility Study.
  • Considering Risks and Options Involved.
  • Engaging with Stakeholders and Preparing the Report.

Differences

The following differences in terms of course content are noted

  • Fundamentals of Business Planning.
  • Financial Models and Accounting Models of Feasibility.
  • The Strategic Context of Business Decisions.
  • Recognising and Assessing Available Alternatives.
  • Designing an Effective Business Plan and Business Planning Tools.

The UK course is a combination of Feasibility Studies and Business Planning all the way through the course.

Other differences are

  • Duration: The UK course is over three weeks; the South African qualification is about 13 weeks.
  • The UK course goes into greater detail on most topics. It has a huge focus on financial models and strategy.
  • Entry requirements are not specified.
  • Articulation possibilities are not specified.
  • The NQF level is not specified.

Conclusion

Both the international qualification and course compare well with the South African qualification. However, the New Zealand qualification compares more favourably with the South African qualification in terms of course content, duration and NQF level.

Providers currently listed

This reflects provider names published on the official record. It is useful for qualification discovery, but it should not be treated as a substitute for checking the relevant quality body’s latest provider status.

No provider listing was captured on this qualification record.

Use this qualification in your readiness workflow

Once the qualification identity is clear, your institution can structure the readiness work around the right title, NQF level, dates, and supporting records instead of rebuilding that story later.