Master of Social Science in Health Research Ethics
Purpose:
Sources: SAQA official qualification record, SAQA registered qualifications record. Yiba Verified does not own the underlying qualification data shown on this page.
Qualification type
Master's Degree
Credits
180
Sub-framework
HEQSF - Higher Education Qualifications Sub-framework
Providers listed
0
Qualification snapshot
Official qualification identity fields captured from the qualification record.
Originator
University of KwaZulu-Natal
Quality assurance functionary
-
Field
Field 09 - Health Sciences and Social Services
Subfield
Promotive Health and Developmental Services
Qual class
Regular-Provider-ELOAC
Recognise previous learning
Y
Important dates
These dates are carried directly from the qualification record.
Registration start
2021-07-01
Registration end
2027-06-30
Last date for enrolment
2028-06-30
Last date for achievement
2031-06-30
Purpose and entry context
Official SAQA text formatted for easier reading.
Purpose and rationale
Purpose
The qualification aims to impart to its trainees applied competence in the ethics review of research protocols, so that they are able to contribute meaningfully and effectively in the ethical review of research in Africa, provide leadership in the formation and Functioning of Research Ethics Committees in Africa and aims to drive scholarship and research in Research Ethics in Africa. It also provides advanced multi-disciplinary education in Health Research Ethics to senior professionals in Africa whose work influences Health Research Ethics and strengthen institutional capacity to continue health research ethics education, development and research in Africa. Finally, it increases ethics review committee awareness of ethical issues in Health Research and extend the impact of South African Research Ethics Training Initiative (SARETI) programmes by facilitating networking of professionals with Health Research Ethics Training and experience in Africa.
Rationale
The overall goal of the qualification is to build African capacity for the ethical review and implementation of health research and to strengthen Africa's institutional training capacity to achieve and sustain this aim.
Entry requirements and RPL
Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL)
The institution accepts the principle underlying outcomes-based, source-based and life-long learning, in which considerations of articulation and mobility play a significant role, and subscribes to the view that Recognition of Prior Learning, whether acquired by formal education curricula at this or another institution or informally (by experience) is an indispensable element in deciding on admission to and awarding credits in an explicitly selected teaching-learning qualification of the institution.
An applicant who falls outside of the formal qualifications system, but who can demonstrate (through the production of substantial and satisfactory evidence) experiential or work-based learning or a non-formal qualification (or a combination), may be considered for admission and/or for the Recognition of Prior Learning for the achievement of the qualification in part or in full. An applicant who after such assessment, is deemed to have sufficient potential, but is in need of further academic development, must be directed to other suitable learning qualifications prior to admission or to parallel qualifications after admission.
Entry Requirements
The minimum entry requirement for this qualification is
- Bachelor of Social Science Honours, National Qualifications Framework (NQF) Level 8.
- Postgraduate Diploma in Health Research Ethics, NQF Level 8.
Replacement note
This qualification does not replace any other qualification and is not replaced by any other qualification.
Structure and assessment
Qualification rules, exit outcomes, and assessment criteria from the SAQA record.
Qualification rules
This qualification consists of the following compulsory and elective modules at National Qualifications Framework Level 9 totalling 192 Credits.
Compulsory Modules 1, Level 9, 128 Credits
- Critical Issues in Informed Consent, 16 Credits.
- Institutionalising Ethical Review of Health Research, 16 Credits.
- Research Dissertation Subsequent Year, 64 Credits.
- Introduction to Bioethics, 16 Credits.
- Research Ethics: African and Indigenous Perspectives, 16 Credits.
Elective Modules, 64 Credits (Choose 4)
- Religion and Ethics in Health Research, 16 Credits.
- Introduction to Human Rights for Health Researchers, 16 Credits.
- Children and Health Research, 16 Credits.
- Behaviour and Research, 16 Credits.
- Responsible Conduct of Research and Research Integrity, 16 Credits.
- Ethical Issues in HIV Vaccine Trials, 16 Credits.
- Ethical Issues in International Collaborative Health Research, 16 Credits.
- Evaluating Research Designs, 16 Credits.
- Ethical Issues in Community - Based Research, 16 Credits.
- Ethical Issues in Women's Health Research, 16 Credits.
- Introduction to Health Law and Health Research, 16 Credits.
Exit level outcomes
- Provide trainees with a solid theoretical foundation and practical competence.
- Conduct and lead ethical review and implementation of health research.
- Train others in providing this review; assists trainees in institutionalising research ethics and ethics review capacity.
- Prepares African professionals to assume leadership positions in health research ethics in Africa.
- Pursue a career or further doctoral studies in this field.
- Demonstrate applied competence in the ethics review of research protocols.
- Contribute meaningfully and effectively in the ethical review of research in Africa.
- Provide leadership in the formation and functioning of Research Ethics Committees in Africa.
- Trainees will drive scholarship and research in Research Ethics in Africa.
Associated assessment criteria
The following Associated Assessment Criteria will be used in an integrated manner across the Exit Level Outcomes
- Critically engage in research ethics scholarship and debate.
- Evaluate and contribute to the role of empirical data in complex research ethics debates.
- Critically engage in research ethics scholarship and debate.
- Evaluate and contribute to the role of empirical data in complex research ethics debates.
Integrated Assessment
All programmes comply with the National Qualifications Framework (NQF) and use a learner-centred approach that emphasises the knowledge, skills and values that should be acquired by the learner. Assessment is based on learner presentations; seminars; lectures; assignments; self-study. Evaluation is also based upon: Class participation and participation in group discussions; Group assignments and presentations; Exercises in facilitation of discussion within groups; Short and long essays written in response to problem cases the learners will have to evaluate; Scenario/case study based exam questions. The approved institution criteria for the registration of external examiners are observed and monitored by the Programme, the Discipline and the Postgraduate/Research Committee. Members of staff employed by the institution in terms of the Universities academic criteria are considered competent to serve as internal moderators. They are selected from staff teaching on the relevant modules. External examiners are staff external to the institution in either academia or practice, with specific expertise in the specialisation. The minimum criterion for an examiner in this programme is a Master's Degree in the relevant field. We have a well-established pool of national and international experts who can assist.
Progression and comparability
Articulation options
This qualification allows possibilities for both vertical and horizontal articulation.
Horizontal Articulation
- Master of Philosophy in Health Systems and Services Research, Level 9.
Vertical Articulation
- Doctor of Philosophy in Clinical and Research Ethics, Level 10.
- Doctor of Philosophy in Ethics, Level 10.
International comparability
This qualification is comparable with similar qualifications offered in various higher education institutions internationally.
Providers currently listed
This reflects provider names published on the official record. It is useful for qualification discovery, but it should not be treated as a substitute for checking the relevant quality body’s latest provider status.
No provider listing was captured on this qualification record.
Related Qualifications
Explore other relevant certificates and degrees in this field.
Purpose:
There are two routes which can be followed to achieve the Master of Philosophy:
Purpose:
The intended purpose of this Master of Accountancy is to provide the learners with a professional, vocational, and sound understanding of the general theoretical principles and their applications in the field of research accountancy. The qualification will be treated according to the policies and procedures of the institution regarding master's dissertations, monitoring, and assessment of learners' progress in the qualification, provision for learners disputes regarding assessment results and Recognition of Prior Learning. The qualification aims to enhance research capacity and increase access by providing an opportunity to articulate to master's degree. The qualification will accommodate learners with a postgraduate diploma and relevant honours/qualifications on NQF level 8, a minimum of 120 credits achieved at other institutions as well as vertical articulation from relevant master's degrees.
Purpose:
Use this qualification in your readiness workflow
Once the qualification identity is clear, your institution can structure the readiness work around the right title, NQF level, dates, and supporting records instead of rebuilding that story later.